Click Here for more inforamation
  • Sun. Apr 14th, 2024

Driven By An Extra 18M Scenarios, Lex Machina’s New ‘Litigation Footprint’ Visually Maps Parties’ Litigation Historys


Apr 1, 2024
Powered By An Added 18M Cases, Lex Machina’s New ‘Litigation Footprint’ Visually Maps Parties’ Litigation Historys

A new device from the litigation analytics company Lex Machina, which is owned by LexisNexis, allows attorneys to look at visible maps of a party’s litigation historical past in get to aid illuminate the party’s relationships and litigation trends that might not usually be apparent but that could be a variable in crafting a litigation strategy or pitching new organization.

Known as Litigation Footprint, it supplies a visual overview of the federal and condition courts across the region in which a celebration has litigated, derived from the litigation histories of get-togethers in over 27 million situations submitted in 94 federal district courts and over 1,300 condition courts in 34 states and the District of Columbia.

“This characteristic is genuinely meeting the purchaser request to present the extremely broadest look at of what’s happening with litigation for get-togethers,” Carla Rydholm, head of products at Lex Machina, explained to me for the duration of a demonstration.

Litigation Footprint overview of federal and condition litigation involving Mattel.

To make this new merchandise, Lex Machina added more than 18 million point out court records to the much more than 9 million federal and point out courtroom data it by now experienced. Most of these new documents lack the enhancements and tagging of Lex Machina’s existing court information — enhancements that help the analytics system for which the company is acknowledged.

Having said that, the new documents involve the information and facts important for the Litigation Footprint, like normalized names across courts and jurisdictions. Lex Machina suggests it now has 134 million normalized names — nearly double what it had in advance of including these new circumstances. (Identify normalization makes sure that a look for for a individual name features all variations and aliases that could show up in court docket information.)

Litigation Footprint contains both individuals improved circumstances and these freshly included basic instances. When benefits incorporate increased cases, the consumer will be ready to click via to see the full Lex Machina analytics.

Profile knowledge and marketplace codes for the party, as well as conditions by social gathering and federal district courtroom instances by sort.

How to Use It

To check out a party’s Litigation Footprint, the consumer simply goes to the bash-search tab in Lex Machina and selects a get together to lookup, or a group of events (this kind of as a organization and its subsidiaries).

Litigation Footprint then reveals two side-by-aspect arrays of grids, every single about approximating the map of the U.S. A single map is for federal courtroom scenarios and the other is for state court docket circumstances. Every dice in the grid represents a point out, and each individual is dynamically coloration-coded to clearly show the volume of conditions inside that condition. The maps might display that a get together has a lot of litigation in some jurisdictions and none in other people.

The consumer can click on any condition to see an expanded listing of the courts in that condition and the numbers of circumstances for that party in just about every. For any court docket for which Lex Machina has improved data, the court docket identify displays as a hyperlink and the consumer can click by way of to the full analytics for the occasion in that courtroom.

Condition court docket filters to exhibit only circumstances with a party in the automotive market.

The person also has the possibility of managing a report to see all the issues involving that bash. The report, exported in the form of an Excel file, demonstrates all the party’s issues, which include circumstance title, circumstance ID, occasion job, occasion title, date submitted, and other details.

Although, as stated, Litigation Footprint can look for conditions for a celebration group, it can not lookup for overlap in between events. In other phrases, if I wished to look for to see the courts in which both of those Apple and Samsung had litigation, I would have to look for every single individually and then cross-reference the final results on my possess.

Federal court docket scenarios filtered to display only all those with a firm headquartered in Canada.

Litigation Footprint also lets queries to be filtered by industry, NAICS code, personnel depend, and headquarters nation.

Rydholm said this is just the initially variation of this solution and that user feed-back will travel its further more improvement.

“We’ll absolutely be in search of a good deal of consumer enter on what to do to maintain people definitely engaged, with a workflow which is significant, and that … can help them get to the subsequent stage of wondering deeply, creating decisions, and executing some thing actionable.”

Merchandise Use Situations

What is the use circumstance for Litigation Footprint, according to Rydholm, the programs most cited by prospects so far are:

  • Organization growth.
  • Aggressive intelligence.
  • Interaction with customers and for lawful groups.
  • Possibility profiles and location developments.
  • Condition court docket scenario docket management.
  • Point out court scenario tactic and civil treatment research.

She said that some buyers obtain the condition courtroom info especially handy, as there has been a hole in their potential to understand what is going on in these courts.

“Just understanding about the cases at initial blush is the commencing position — assembling the most comprehensive mapping of what’s took place ahead of and then determining to have your workforce dig in, relying on the venue, is the significant 1,” she said.

Growing Coverage

As I’ve famous just before, at any time considering that LexisNexis acquired Lex Machina in 2015, the organization has been growing its courtroom analytics, both equally by growing its federal courtroom analytics into new practice areas and by expanding its protection of point out courts. 

Because 2015, when Lex Machina coated 91,000 federal scenarios, it has steadily developed to wherever, by the conclusion of 2023, it experienced virtually 5 million state instances and more than 4.1 million federal situations.

Litigation Footprint provides a further 18 million state instances to that overall. Though, as famous above, a lot of of people are not improved for strong information analytics, the corporation is regularly doing the job to extend the figures of enhanced scenarios in its selection, Rydholm claimed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *