At a time when authorized know-how companies are making it simpler to accessibility and assess courtroom documents, what ought to – and need to not – be done to safeguard private court files that are sealed from public accessibility?
This dilemma arrived to a head last July, when a federal court in North Carolina took the drastic step of issuing a standing purchase that correctly banned attorneys in that district from using third-celebration support providers these kinds of as PacerPro, RECAP or DocketBird. That buy came on the heels of a memorandum from the Administrative Place of work of the U.S. Courts that – although it didn’t outright ban the use of these kinds of services providers – it did urge courts to alert filers to be careful about working with 3rd-celebration providers and software program.
Ended up these actions justified? Is there explanation to be concerned about 3rd-party suppliers? And what specifically is the very best way to shield sealed files?
To solution these questions, the lawful tech company PacerPro brought alongside one another a panel of experts for a are living plan introduced for the duration of the annual meeting of the Countrywide Docketing Affiliation in Boston in October. On the panel had been:
I moderated the panel and recorded it for this podcast. Many thanks to the panelists, the NDA, and PacerPro for allowing me to do that.
Thank You To Our Sponsors
This episode of LawNext is generously built attainable by our sponsors. We value their support and hope you will check them out.
If you love listening to LawNext, be sure to leave us a critique where ever you listen to podcasts.